各位朋友，论文大修返回后，编辑给了如下意见：
I am pleased to inform you that your paper entitled "XX" has been accepted for publication in Tribology Letters.
The reviewer comments are appended below and you may, of course, make optional revisions at this point. If we have not heard from you within seven (7) days, the manuscript will be forwarded to the publisher.
Reviewer #1：
You have responded to the comments in a responsible way and it has improved in both readability and technical accuracy. I will recommend your manuscript for publication but I still have a closing remark that cannot leave my head. You have not convinced me that your test rig and the test rig of your reference [24] is that different just because you change peripheral features like oil pad flatness and the position of the inlet pipe. In this sense you attempt to prove your own lemma by referring back to itself. Since I have no equivalent test rig at my own disposal (to validate your hypothesis), I will leave this to your own judgement and ethics.

投稿系统显示如下：Submissions needing revision  
current status(optional changes suggested)
View Decision(Accept with optional revisions)
请问：如何处理这样审稿意见，期待虫友分享心得 返回小木虫查看更多