各位大虾,刚收到专家意见Consider after Major Changes 但是 编辑直接Rejected
在 Shock and Vibration上投了论文 专家给的是Consider after Major Changes 但是 编辑直接Rejected
专辑意见:
This paper studies the influence of******. However, it is not insightful enough to be published. The comments are listed as follows:
1)Based on a preliminary reading, the English text is to be significantly improved and substantial editing is required before it is accepted for publication. My advice is that you have your manuscript edited by a native English speaker. Alternatively, you may use an editing service.
2)Too many Chinese language articles are cited which is not suitable for publication in an international journal.
3)With regard to the equations listed in the paper, Eqns. (1)-(3) should not be repeated with the related references, only the final results and citations are required to be written. The same case for the other equations, the authors should give the proper citation and outstand contribution.
4)The authors cite many articles in section 2 and section 3. Which theory or equation is proposed by you? What is the function and application of them in this paper?
5)Section 4, the constitutive law of rock used in the numerical simulation should be given. How is the model setup related to analytical solution?
6)Section 5, the application is totally isolated from the previous analytical solution and numerical simulation. In this regard, we cannot find the usefulness of this study to support the engineering design.
请问有没有必要修改后重新投稿还是改投好
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
刚刚收到编辑的邮件
I regret to inform you that it was found to be unsuitable for publication in Shock and Vibration. You may log in to the Manuscript Tracking System in order to read the review report(s) received for your manuscript.
We do encourage you to revise and resubmit your paper once you have addressed the concerns and criticisms. 最后一句是不是可以重投 还是客气一下
,
建议修改后改投而不是重投
脦脪脢脟脨脗脢脰虏禄麓贸露庐 脨脼赂脛潞贸驴脡脪脭脰脴脥露脗冒 脰脴脥露卤禄戮脺碌脛驴脡脛脺脨脭脢脟虏禄脢脟潞脺麓贸
脙梅脧脭脢脟脨脼赂脛潞贸脰脴脥露拢卢脛脟赂枚脠脣鹿铆鲁露
[ 路垄脳脭脢脰禄煤掳忙 https://muchong.com/3g ]
看了审稿意见,个人觉得编辑主要不满意你的是:一,文章没有亮点,通篇引用别人,没有自己的东西。二 、核心的内容本构模型都没建立。你要再投,不论哪个期刊,你得有属于自己的核心内容。
建议按照comments修改后重投,并在重投前进行语言润色。
脮芒虏禄脢脟戮脺赂氓掳隆拢卢麓贸脨脼掳脡拢驴驴脡脪脭脥露碌脛
[ 路垄脳脭脢脰禄煤掳忙 https://muchong.com/3g ]