给Accept after minor revision的这个审稿人A觉得文章新颖，结论有意义，说语言需要Significant editing；
另外一个审稿人B说语言很好，但认为文章没啥意思，指出文中研究的问题1paper1已经研究过了，问题2在paper2中有研究，意思跟某些paper比较像，说it does not contain any novel contribution 给reject。
omg，这篇论文已经两次这样的结果了，都是一正一反，反差巨大，上次编辑给拒了，
这次主编：
Your above referenced paper  has now been reviewed. Two Referees’ reports are attached to this e-mail in which the Referees indicate that major corrections are needed to your paper and one recommends rejection.

If you wish to have your paper re-reviewed I would be grateful if you would amend the article along the lines suggested. Please prepare a revised version and a list of changes that have been made for further consideration. It is essential that you respond to each one of the Referee’s comments in full in an accompanying letter.

修回再审是不是还得B看啊，我觉得不大可能扭转他的想法啊，不知道该怎么response，唉

还好结果是好的

[ Last edited by 三流作者 on 2017-12-9 at 18:49 ] 返回小木虫查看更多