In statistical analysis section, the authors reported data derived from at least three independent replicates were presented as mean ± SE and values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. While in results the statistical, significant considered at p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001 why (correct).审稿人这么问的
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
In statistical analysis section, the authors reported data derived from at least three independent replicates were presented as mean ± SE and values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. While in results the statistical, significant considered at p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001 why (correct).审稿人这么问的
我遇到了相同的问题。。。当时也纳闷美国专家该是多严si谨ban....解决办法就是，如果一个结果要用significant表述，那么后面括号里都写p<0.05。哪怕这里是p=0.00001我也写小于0.05。因为论文规定significant和小于0.05相对应。。。
问你表达statistically significant为何用三种水平？要你解释原因，而不是用个什么单词来表征程度不同。
我的建议是，如果你并没有什么特别的有说服力的原因，那么用一种常用的表达显著性的水平就可以了
，
little less least; small smaller smallest; clear more clear most clear