两个审稿人，主编给大修

看不出来2个审稿人的结论给的是大修，还是小修

Reviewer #3:
This paper presents ...............
I think the study an interesting contribution and I also think that was well improved.
It should be interesting to understand ........... I agree but for another contexts those .....................parameters should be the same and should have the same "weight"? And for those different contexts, can be the conclusion the same!

Reviewer #4:
The overview of this paper is very interesting. The authors attempted to present a new method for identifying the key factors in ............... modeling. However there is some points that should be considered e.g. English grammar and missing some definition. The overall review can be summarized as follow:
...
10 个问题，不是很难回答 返回小木虫查看更多