不知道审稿人想表达什么?
The authors propose a new method for the determination of 38 …… in vegetables after the previous extraction of the analytes by QuEChERS. It is of interest the separation of 38 analytes in very short period of time. Target analytes are considered persistent contaminant in agricultural products with potential toxicity. Method development has been well conducted thoroughly the work reported in the manuscript. However, the final validation needs additional discussion. Thus, accuracy is evaluated by recovery studies. This way has some limitation, as for every analyte and sample a wide variety of recoveries was observed. The authors should demonstrated how these values are used for reporting the specific results (in concentration values with the corresponding uncertainties) when the method is applied to particular types of samples. It is not clear that Tables S3 and S4 have properly been addressed taken into account this issue.
万能的虫友,审稿人是什么意思啊?是说添加回收来确证准确度不行吗?还是要求不确定度什么的?还是有什么其它的意思?不懂,求助
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
貌似对你的方法的通用性有些疑问
祝福
Sorry but we can't give you an appropriate (meaningful) answer based on just a paragraph. Honestly, you will need to give the article to someone to check what's the problem. Otherwise we are just guessing,
貌似你的回收率实验数据不算很好。回收率结论没有反应在你的样品测定数据表格里。建议参照一篇好文章修改你的数据表达方式。