各位帮忙分析下现在是什么情况
收到的邮件如下:
Dear Dr. Xu,
I have received the report from our adviser on your manuscript, which you submitted to Solar Physics.
I regret that the referee raises substantial issues, recommending that the manuscript should not be considered further in anything like its present form.
If you wish to pursue this with a rebuttal, please let us know. In that case, you are asked to carefully consider the reviewer comments, which are attached, respond to them substantially as a separate submission item, in addition to the revised manuscript.
with regrets,
John Leibacher
Editor-in-Chief
然后后面加了一个审稿人的意见,4个问题,然后审稿人最后建议拒稿。然后我去杂志的页面看了,写着 Final decision reject
现在这样肯定意思是被拒搞了,还有必要反驳审稿人意见吗?
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
为什么只有一个审稿人意见呢
被拒了也要好好说说,问的问题都明明在杂志里有解释
如果不服审稿意见,可以按照编辑指示申诉
还有这个程序
,
编辑的意思是拒稿重投,关键是你认不同审稿人的意见?
如果认同的话,就按编辑说的,修改后,可以重新投稿。
如果不认同的话,改投。
六楼正解。祝福 好运!
如果楼主对审稿意见不满,可以提起辩驳,除了要提交修改稿以外,还要充分考虑审稿意见并给出合理的回复。