前天submitted，昨天rejected
主编希望修改后重投，可是责任编辑的一些问题有点难以捉摸，提供原件与大家交流下
Ms. Ref. No.:  JCLEPRO-D-17-06182
Title: XXX
Journal of Cleaner Production

Dear Professor XXX,

Thank you for considering Journal of Cleaner Production.

Although you have an interesting and valuable paper, the paper needs to be substantial improved before it can be considered for Journal of Cleaner Production.

Below please find editor's comments for your guidance. We hope you can consider improving the manuscript accordingly and resubmitting it as a new article.

Meanwhile, we hope that the articles we have published in the Journal of Cleaner Production will continue to be useful for you and your colleagues in research and teaching.


Yours sincerely,

XXX
Co-Editor-in-Chief
Journal of Cleaner Production

Reviewers' comments:

Thank you for your interest in JCLP as a target outlet to submit a result of your fine research work. However, this manuscript failed to clearly show contribution to the body of knowledge JCLP has been developing. I also suggest you to re-read the instruction for authors and the journal's scope.（是说稿件与期刊主旨不符吗？）
As it is, the paper seems more a technical report, please use the literature background to broaden the manuscript foundation.（所谓的use the literature background to broaden the manuscript foundation是指在introduction充分利用相关文献部分拓展、提升论文基调吗？）
Please develop a much better title. This one does not state what is important to catch the prospective reader's attention.
Underscore the scientific value added of your paper in your abstract. Please look at articles we have published for models. Your abstract should clearly state the essence of the problem you are addressing, what you did and what you found and recommend. That will help a prospective reader of the abstract to decide if they wish to read the entire article.
Please make sure your conclusions' section underscore the scientific value added of your paper, and/or the applicability of your findings/results. Highlight the novelty of your study. Clearly discuss what the previous studies that you are referring to are. （这句话表达的意思是什么？）What are the Research Gaps/Contributions.
The paper is very experimental, and discussion and conclusions clearly do not establish a strong correlation with cleaner production/sustainability/environmental concerns （结果与讨论需要往这三个方面靠拢吗？）. In your discussion section please link your empirical results with a broader and deeper literature review（文献支撑自己的主要结论？）. In your conclusions, please discuss the implications of your research.
Grammar and syntax must be improved. Revision with the help of a native English speaker is highly recommended.
I hope that the feedback I provided should be useful for authors and I recommend to take more time and care if submitting a revised version of the manuscript. 返回小木虫查看更多