这个小修意见是啥意思?
如题,论文返回了修改意见,是minor revision,总共两个审稿人,第一个审稿人给了两条意见,第二个貌似是没给修改意见?
Reviewer #1: The manuscript is clear, but have a couple of comments:
- From lines 94 - 129 there is a complete description and review of another paper / research, these lines should have been utilized to talk about the current research.
- More in the field results that shows the validity of your research approach should be present, as there is no proof that these risk do exist, or if the vary from one site to another as you described.
Reviewer #2: The paper has a very interesting topic and gives new hints for the analysis of the gasification hazards.
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
congratulations
根据第一个意见再改改论文
这是mdpi的期刊吧
问题不大,稍微改改就接受了
This is very simple!. The second reviewer does not require anything. Just thank him in your response letter.
The first reviewer is asking you to address two problems. But I think are very easy to address. If you need my help let me know, but it's very easy problem,
祝好
祝福