昨天下午收到编辑发的Minor Revison Required邮件如下。
Dear Dr. XX,
Following the review of your Research Article titled "XXXXXXX" by XX, XX, and XX, I recommend that it should be revised taking into account the changes requested by the reviewer(s). As the submitting author, please log in to the Manuscript Tracking System to read the submitted review report(s) and submit the revised version of your manuscript no later than Wednesday, August 16, 2017.

文章评审意见如下：
Comments to the Author
Paper is an interesting one but there are many elements that need to be addressed:

1.The novelty of the research is not clearly apparent and should be highlighted.
2.This paper focus on the study of four species of roots reinforcement. In practice, the strength should express on direct shear test instead of unconfined compression test. How the results will help the practice.
3.The correlations developed are based on only one type of soils. Are there any other
related studies that can be used for validation of the correlations.
4.Improvements and explanations are generic in nature and no solid explanations and evidences are given.
5.Editing is needed and it should be done in many places.

Paper should provide implementation potential of this work which is lacking. This would enhance the practical value of the paper.

其中意见的第二条里让我替换一种实验方法，他提到的这种实验方法其实是针对这类问题主要的研究方法，并且在实验的前期也采用这种方案尝试了大量的实验，但是都无法收集到可靠的数据，考虑到材料本身的性质以及实际的实验境况 再者与后文中一个实验的结合   这种方法收集不到可靠的数据，所以就换了一种实验方法。
并且编辑要求16号之前就要返回，如果补做实验的话  单实验可能就要将近20天  不能在规定的时间返回，求大神们指导接下来该怎么办？？

 返回小木虫查看更多