本人投了一篇微晶玻璃的论文，审稿意见回来，好像是做陶瓷的人帮忙审的，给的意见看得人一脸懵逼。各位大神们，帮我看看这个审稿人到底让干什么？该怎么修改？

审稿意见如下:

The work of "**" is mostly experimental in nature and devoted to the study of glass-ceramic systems based on oxides of silicon and boron.

In the study of work, I would highlight the following drawback. The absence of a fundamental theory. Experimental data confirming the properties of the system under study is given in full. However, the study of ceramics-forming systems containing two or more stekloobrazovaniya requires serious theoretical justification. The authors can be published, however, I'd recommend adding a theoretical justification tracked in spectroscopy patterns for the studied system. Moreover, all of them basically fit into the concept of a Stanworth (Homopolar connection concept). 返回小木虫查看更多