投稿carbon,这样的情况申诉的成功率高吗?
6月投稿carbon,历时1个多月,被拒绝,有3位审稿人,一位小修,一位大修(大修意见还没有小修的难搞),一位拒稿。拒稿理由是我做的之前有别人做过,并给出一些参考文献。我找出审稿人指出的文献一一比较,和我的都是合成方法上面有些许不同,感觉我的合成方法相当于一个综合文献优点,优化结果的过程。老板想让我申诉,各位大神麻烦看看,这样申诉的成功率高么?
如下是编辑的意见
Thank you for your recent submission to CARBON. We have solicited and received reviewer comments, which can be found below.
Based on this review process, we do not plan to proceed with publication of your manuscript. Please understand that publication in Carbon is quite competitive, and we are forced to reject many valuable studies that may go on to be published in other scientific journals.
Please also consider that an appeal of this decision might result in a lengthy and time consuming editorial process, which in most cases does not revert the editorial decision. The journal would not operate if we consider all appeals for revisions. Thus, I respectfully suggest you to improve the quality of your manuscript based on the comments made by the reviewers, and resubmit to a more specialized journal on drug delivery.
We thank you for letting us consider your manuscript, and hope you will submit the best of your future work to Carbon.
如下是拒稿审稿人的意见
Reviewer #2: This manuscript reports on the synthesis of N-doped mesoporous carbon sub-micron spheres by silica driven co-assembly. Firstly, silica driven co-assembly strategy for porous carbon synthesis is not new. There are several papers available on the synthesis of mesoporous carbon nanospheres by self assembly and co-assembly strategy with or without colloidal silica. See for example J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3, 2305-2313; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 3591 -3595; ACS Nano, 2013, 7, 8706-8714; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 11652-11662; Macromolecules 2013, 46, 140?145; Nature Commun. 2013, 4, 2798. The manuscript is not suitable for CARBON.
Other comments:
i. In the abstract, authors claimed that "Interestingly, SN not only acted as a pore-forming agent but also as a driven agent to induce the co-assembly of F127, carbon precursors and SN, which has never been reported". I feel the authors' claim is not be accurate. There are several reports where silica and F127 both act as pore forming agents. There are also reports on the size controllable nitrogen doped mesoporous carbon nanospheres without using colloidal silica.
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
可以考虑申诉试试,祝福楼主!
不是说了别申诉了吗
执负面意见的审稿意见没有明显的错误,在申诉的时候编辑一般会支持审稿人,结果可能是根本没有回应,即使给了重新审稿的机会,仍然可能被审稿人以没有足够新意的理由拒稿,楼主可以参考审稿意见修改后改投,
楼主,我跟你做的方向很像。我觉得你很难去改变拒绝你稿件的那个审稿人的想法。申诉的意义不大。曾经我也遇到过类似的情况。如果有必要,咱们可以私下交流。
按照意见修改,修改后改投
申诉吧,不过一定要把申诉理由写清楚,有理就行,你申诉又不会影响你什么,你怕什么啊