本人研二小硕一枚，最近这篇文章被轮番秒拒，难得最后这次投IBB终于送审，可是却被批得体无完肤。。。
实在不理解，自己文章真有这么差？？研一的时候好歹也发过一篇一区的论文，也不算新手了，自认这篇文章不是很好，只是为了研三加分不交学费而写的，但是也不至于审稿人说得这样不堪吧？

自己实验也不是很顺利，研究生两年快把自己科研的热情磨光了，不打算读博了，只想出去实习找工作。
可是老板对实验要求却高，人也走不掉。

有种诸事不顺的感觉。有相同境遇的小硕，共勉吧。

附上审稿人的审稿意见。

Comments from the editors and reviewers:

Reviewer 1
This paper was very poorly written. The paper contains numerous English and Editorial errors. The presented results are nothing new or novel that needs publication. The writing is very convoluted and redundant. The writing did not meet journal quality and standard. The paper lacks statistical analysis and standard deviation.（其实我线图上都有标准偏差的，不懂审稿人为嘛这么说）


Reviewer 3
This is a poorly written paper. The writing is very convoluted and it is difficult to follow. There are too many English mistakes in the paper. This paper is not acceptable in the current form for publication in IBB.

再补充点吧，其实我个人觉得审稿人很敷衍。。。这篇文章送审前editor in chief曾让我修改过，补充过内容这些，说明至少他觉得我语言达到了基本门槛，需要修改但肯定不该是主要问题啊。。。但是这两个审稿人除了语言问题，没提出任何实质性意见，让我觉得真的很不合理

[ Last edited by darkreborn on 2017-7-12 at 22:49 ] 返回小木虫查看更多