一审回来,帮忙看看editor 的潜台词
上月投了clinical neurophysiology, 昨天一审回来,三个审稿人的意见中,两个比较negative,就论文的整体写作上和研究方法上有不少大问题,其中一个审稿人提了一堆意见之后还补充了一句” if this ms is going to be revised please be sure to use different color fonts in the revised version to allow tracking of the changes.”感觉他预期editor提供修改的概率很低的样子。第三个审稿人比较positive,认为研究过程很accurate, 研究主题也有新意。然后editor给我的信是这样写的:Your paper has been evaluated by the Editors and Reviewers. The Editor has advised that the manuscript will be reconsidered after major revision. No guarantee on acceptance can be given at this stage. That will depend not only on your addressing the issues raised by the current Reviewers, but also their numerical ratings of the revised manuscript and the reports of any additional Reviewers that the Associate Editor may need to consult。其中说的numerical rating以前投稿时没遇到过,另外reports of any additional reviewers ......是指返修之后还需要找这三个审稿人之外的其他审稿人来决定吗?
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
祝福
没有任何潜台词吧。就是让你好好改呗。
numerical ratings就是期刊会让审稿人给稿件打分,以此作为可能的判定依据。最后一句里的may表示有可能会找,并不是一定的。然后期刊所有的常规信件都是直接用模版的,没有什么潜台词。好好改吧,预祝顺利发表!
不用多想,好好改问题不大
谢谢
嗯,不想太多,改!谢谢
受教了,谢谢虫友,加油改吧
,