研究方法用了问卷，涉及到人。邮件内容如下
：

Thank you for your submission to PLOS ONE. In line with the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki, we expect all research involving human participants and/or medical data to have been approved by the authors' Institutional Review Board (IRB) or by equivalent ethics committee(s). If the need for ethical approval is waived, this should be formally confirmed by a suitable committee generally before the start of the study.

As the requirements of journals and institutions are becoming stricter, approval from an independent ethics committee is becoming the norm for all research studies involving human participants and/or medical information independently of how low the risks are. Please note that we reserve the right to reject any submission that does not meet these standards, which in some cases are more stringent than local ethical standards.

Therefore before we can proceed further, we would require your ethics committee to formally confirm that they either approved your protocols or that ethical approval was not needed in this case. Please note that we do not accept retrospective ethics approval. (If approval is needed, this should have been done before the start of the study.) Please include a copy of the letter from the ethics committee as an "Other" file.

Additionally, please amend your methods section to include the following information:

a) Did participants provide their written or verbal informed consent to participate in this study?

b) If consent was verbal, please explain:
   i) Why was written consent not obtained?  
   ii) How did you record/document participant consent?

c) Did the ethics committees/IRBs approve this consent procedure?

We hope you understand the reasons behind this request and look forward to hearing from you.

Your manuscript has been returned to your account. Please log on to PLOS Editorial Manager at  返回小木虫查看更多