2017.04.13 投稿
2017.04.14 With assessor
2017.04.20 With reviewer(s)
2017.05.13 Two reviewers' reports received
2017.05.16 Revise(B2 - inv. to revise and resubmit for re-refereeing)
意见还不错，虽然问题很多，但是审稿人的总体意见还不错，不得不说这个冷门期刊的初审速度还是不错的，这篇文章被拒好多次了，终于有给修改的了，修改时间只有20天，得抓紧时间好好修改了，中了再来散金币。

Reviewer #1:
This is a good paper. It is very well written and the reading flow is good.
1 - Some key information about the pavements is still necessary for a better analysis of the paper and for understanding of the pavement specialists, such as:......巴拉巴拉

Reviewer #2:
The authors investigate the ******. The article is of great value to those designing airfield pavements in saline soil areas.  This reviewer makes the following recommended revisions before the article is published.....巴拉巴拉 返回小木虫查看更多