一审(三个月)返回两个审稿人意见，意见如下：
编辑邮件：
Reviewers (2) have now commented on your manuscript and recommend a revision.  For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below and in a separate file to download.

Reviewer #1: comments
     This paper analyses the *******************************. While the topic of the paper is well suited to the scope of the journal, and its scientific contribution seems significant to the related field, this manuscript needs to be better prepared before it is considered to be published.

     Most of all, not all figures mentioned in the main text are presented. Thus the figure numbers in the text and figure title do not match which makes very difficult to review. Also, there are numerous numbers of variables and parameters. I'd suggest to include a table that describes variables and parameters.

    While the main focus of this research is to examine the *******, it is not clear how this strategy is applied. I think it should be more elaborated so the readers can reproduce the results.

Reviewer #2: comments
    In this sense this work is interesting because it marries (for the first time as far as I know) the more complicated solution of the **** theory insteadof the simplified****, with an analysis of the ********of the network in order to ************* to increase robustness.

    Another useful feature of this work is to ****************************

    Still, I feel that because this problem has been looked through so many different techniques, ** and **, that it would increase tremendously theusefulness of this particular work and make it worth publication  if a comparison could be included on the results that one would get through some of the other methods, to compare the usefulness of the current proposed approach.

     In summary, I feel that this is an interesting an original work, but the problems mentioned should be addressed before the paper is ready for publication.

第一个给了29条意见，第二个给了9条，编辑给了Revise。二位都对方向比较感兴趣，没有质疑方法，结果以及结论的讨论，主要对具体case应用的过程提出疑问觉得没写太清楚。各位虫友看看有希望吗？修改后是继续这两个人审还是重新找审稿人送审？

PS:修改稿要交 a list of all the changes made to the manuscript，这个是原文一句，改动一句这样写？第一次投稿，没经验。。 返回小木虫查看更多