看不懂审稿人的意思？ 有效数字的问题！！
1）All calibration equations are written with an unrealistic number of significant figures. Standard deviations in the slope and the ordinate at the origin should be incorporated and all quantities should be expressed with the pertinent number of significant figures according to the IUPAC recommendations.
其中一组数据： I (mA) = -0.0544X-2.0313, R2 = 0.9983
2）The same problem appears in Table 2. The values of the "obtained concentration" were totally unrealistic. The authors should be aware that a value of, for instance, 5.0039 implies that this quantity is know with an uncertainty of 0.002 % (!).
5.0039是table2中的一个数据
审稿人是说我的有效数字不对吗? IUPAC recommendations里面有关于有效数字的吗？跪求大神帮助应该如何修改
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
求大神回复
所有校准方程都用不切实际数量的有效数字编写。 应包含原产地的斜率和纵坐标的标准偏差，所有数量应按照IUPAC建议的有关数字的相关数量表示。
应该如何修改呢？一般要保留几位呢？
II) Linear equations in page 13 and Figures 7 and 8b should be rewritten incorporating the standard deviations in the slope and the ordinate at the origin and writing all quantities with the number of significant figures according to the usual IUPAC recommendations. Slopes in page 15 and all other quantities (in particular in Table 2) should be rewritten using the pertinent number of significant figures according to the usual IUPAC recommendations based on the above analysis of errors.
这是我前几天回来的修改意见，和你的差不多。the standard deviations in the slope and the ordinate at the origin 的应当是y=(a±b)x+（c±d）中b和d吧，也就是标准偏差。
第二个问题是你检测到的值，也±了的吗？比如：5.0039±0.001，它的不确定度就是0.001/5.0039=0.019%，太低了，不符合实际。
希望能帮助到你，前几天我也焦头烂额，文章前天返回去的，结果还不知道，
我没看到时间，请问你最后解决了吗？怎么解决的？