有篇文章投稿到ACM TOMM 收到审稿意见。
除了每个审稿人的评审意见外，每个审稿意见后面都附有这些问题，请问这些问题也需要像审稿意见一一回复吗？或者应该怎么处理，谢谢！！！

Additional Questions:
Review's recommendation for paper type: Full length technical paper

Should this paper be considered for a best paper award?: No

Does this paper present innovative ideas or material?: No

In what ways does this paper advance the field?: The proposed solution exploits 。。。。。

Is the information in the paper sound, factual, and accurate?: Yes
If not, please explain why.:

What are the major contributions of the paper?: The way the authors augment the training set 。。。。

Rate how well the ideas are presented (very difficult to understand=1 very easy to understand =5: 3

Rate the overall quality of the writing (very poor=1, excellent=5: 3

Does this paper cite and use appropriate references?: No

If not, what important references are missing?: The related work section must be thoroughly reviewed. 。。。

Should anything be deleted from or condensed in the paper?: Yes
If so, please explain.: Please refer to the comments on the "related work" section.

Is the treatment of the subject complete?: Yes
If not, What important details / ideas/ analyses are missing?:

Please help ACM create a more efficient time-to-publication process: Using your best judgment, what amount of copy editing do you think this paper needs?: Moderate

Most ACM journal papers are researcher-oriented. Is this paper of potential interest to developers and engineers?: Maybe 返回小木虫查看更多