论文给了小修，不过有两条审稿人的意见看不大懂
论文给了小修，不过有两条审稿人的意见看不大懂
Q(5): There is reference to the need for more testing. There should be discussion of what the authors think is missing from current codes such as Eurocodes 3 and 4. They are found to give ‘conservative’ predictions of fatigue life, as they should for individual tests.
这个完全没看懂他想表达什么意思？
Q(6): Linear-elastic partial-interaction analysis can predict ranges of shear stress in studs in beams with partial shear connection. It would be useful to compare such predictions with the test results.
这个感觉不算一个问题？ 就这样陈述一下么 我该如何回答呢？
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
这二个问题是衔接的。先做第五问的test然后再比较结果
问题5 是说材料的疲劳期，应该测试，和讨论。给你了建议。
，
问题6也是给你的建议。不是评论。