当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >(电力系统方向)审稿人的意见太专业了,看不懂,求指教

(电力系统方向)审稿人的意见太专业了,看不懂,求指教

作者 xaoshaoying
来源: 小木虫 150 3 举报帖子
+关注

求电力系统的同仁,向IET投了一篇论文,做的是概率潮流方面的,审稿专家提出的意见,有点看不懂,求指教:
Reviewer: 1

Comments to the Author
The paper describes a probabilistic power flow (PPF)  analysis,  where Gaussian copula is used to model the power system control variable. A case study is presented where IEEE
118-bus system modified to include wind farms having   346 Doubly-fed induction wind generators in  14 different nodes. The performance Point estimate method (PEM) is determined using the error indices given by equation (47) using mean value. Finally, in table-2 the error indices are presented for the voltage V, phase angle, active power flow, reactive power respectively.
The paper is not addressing the issues related to power system operation in terms of the measures provided in the simulation results. The following facts are to be addressed:-

1. How error indices  play role in the power system planning and operation ?
2. Whether voltage , phase angle, active power flow, reactive power provided in the table are  bus variables ?
3. If  probability of wind velocity for  346 Doubly-fed induction wind generators  are considered,  it is necessary to quantify the effect in the generation value.
4. Finally, based on the probabilistic load and generation value for a given snap shot condition load flow results for the system has to be provided.. Further, it is necessary to establish relation of  voltage , phase angle, active power flow, reactive power determined from load flow analysis to the  error indices presented in the paper.

特别是3、4,看不懂是什么意思,求各位虫友指教!! 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • a4222993

    概率的 哎

  • 冬博士

    我也投了一篇IET,电力系统方向的,收到了major revision,请问这个major revision有模板吗,

猜你喜欢