审稿意见审稿人的编号直接从#1跳到#4，不会是编辑忘记复制#2和#3的了吧
第一次投稿，审稿意见只有两个审稿人的，但是编号从#1直接到#4，不会是编辑忘记复制#2和#3的了吧，大家有遇到过这种情况吗？
Reviewer #1: The authors systematically studied the constitutive modeling for the mechanical response of porous PDLLA/nano-HA under different stress conditions, using various fundamental compressible hyper-elastic constitutive models. The manuscript was well organized, and thus can be considered for publication in JMBBM after minor revision.
Page 9: The sentence-"When the nominal strain of PDLLA/nano-HA with 10 wt. % and 37 wt. % nano-HA reach -0.45 and -0.4, respectively " is incomplete. Please re-write it.
Reviewer #4: 1.Actually I rarely read this category of article,but I am interested in the title and theme of this article,and I have learn a lot. The contents of this article is detailed and novel , the spelling and grammar is correct, and the emphasis is distinct, so it seem quite meets the criterion of Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials.
2.Is there any references to explain the difference between these four scaffold materials? It is better to list some.
3.The framework need to improve. Is essential to write the discuss part in this article, or analyze the advantage and the shortcoming of this article?
4.The conclusion is authority and distinct.
5.Although I don't understand all the method of this article, the formulas and the graphs are rather good!
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
我遇到过编辑认为某些审稿人太扯而直接忽略他的意见的情况
其他2人没有返回意见，你就按着这个修改就可以了
想问下，你投这个杂志，多久收到回复的？
1月9号投的，3月5号收到的审稿意见
中的可能性很大！
想问下，你是做的哪方面的�
，
其他两个人没有返回意见！编辑觉得1和4审稿人的意见可以！