投Sci Report一篇
经过2个月的审稿,Scientific Report给的意见是:
You will see that, while your work is of interest, substantive concerns were raised that suggest that your paper does not fulfil the publication requirements for Scientific Reports that is, that papers must be technically sound in method and analysis. Unfortunately, these reservations are sufficiently important to preclude publication of this study in Scientific Reports.
Thank you for the opportunity to consider your work. I am sorry that we cannot be more positive on this occasion and hope you will not be deterred from submitting future work to Scientific Reports。
也就是委婉拒绝了是吧?还有回复余地吗?谢谢高人指点。
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
拒稿了,编辑认为论文水平不够,都没有送外审。另投他刊吧
拒稿了
标准拒稿邮件,改投其它吧
这个拒稿并不委婉啊。。。
很官方的拒稿, 如果你任务真的很有新意 可以申诉试试, 不过编辑拒稿很难成功,
期刊要求方法和分析上有创新。