当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >一个审稿人小修,一个审稿人据稿,编辑据稿,这个可以申述么?

一个审稿人小修,一个审稿人据稿,编辑据稿,这个可以申述么?

作者 西红柿炖牛肉
来源: 小木虫 250 5 举报帖子
+关注

如题。投稿到PRE。一个审稿人的意见是小修;另外一个审稿人的意见是据稿,编辑的意见 貌似是据稿。感觉挺遗憾的,觉得自己做的东西挺重要的。还可以再投,或者申述么?或者直接投稿到其他杂志?

编辑的是个associate editor,意见如下:

Dear Dr. X,

The manuscript described here has been reviewed by two of our
referees. Comments from the reports appear below.

To be publishable in the Physical Review, manuscripts must be
technically correct, must contain significant new physics or
understanding, be of high quality and scientific interest, and be
recognized as an important contribution to the literature.

The comments of the referees suggest that the present manuscript does
not meet the above criteria and thus is not suitable for publication
in the Physical Review.

As a small aside: we noticed that your eqn. (24) contains the sum of a
vector and a scalar, which appears incorrect. Presumably you mean to
write (x^2+\delta)^{n/2} or something similar.

Yours sincerely,


Associate Editor 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • 西红柿炖牛肉

    其实编辑提的那个问题,也包含错误,要不要指出来?

  • 西红柿炖牛肉

    。。。没有哪位兄弟帮回答下么? 没有经验,金币少了。。。可增加

  • tibetnamco

    引用回帖:
    2楼: Originally posted by 西红柿炖牛肉 at 2017-02-13 10:22:24
    其实编辑提的那个问题,也包含错误,要不要指出来?

    可以申诉。不过戏不大,编辑提出的这个小问题不是关键,关键是有个审稿人拒稿了,一综合,再根据刊的录用惯例,基本没戏

  • 西红柿炖牛肉

    有建议就有金币。。。

  • MM0122

    祝福

猜你喜欢