投稿后得到了这样的回复，研一小硕，第一次投，求各位大神帮忙分析一下。
A revised version of your manuscript that takes into account, and addresses in detail, all the comments of the reviewer(s) will be reconsidered for publication.
Please note that submitting a revision of your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your revision will be subject to re-review by the reviewer(s) before a decision is rendered.
When submitting your revised manuscript, it is mandatory that you respond in detail to each of the comments made by the reviewer(s) in the space provided. Please ensure that your response is reflected in the main text and you should use this space to document the changes you make to the original manuscript。
他这意思是不是让大修啊？还有一个问题，审稿人的问题需要一个一个都回答吗？@Monash2011
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
他这意思是不是让大修啊？还有一个问题，审稿人的问题需要一个一个都回答吗？
不过不管大修小修。修改到位，回答令审稿人满意文章才有被接收的希望，大修后有直接接收的，小修后被拒的。审稿人的问题需要一问一答点对点。类似于这样的：
Responds to the reviewer’s comments:
Reviewer #1:
1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)
Response: ××××××
2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)
Response: ××××××
......
https://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=10272829，
需要都回答的，我们回信一般都是point to point response，每一个问题都要反复思考，最起码得说服自己吧，即使你觉得这个问题没有修改的必要也要告诉审稿人为什么不用修改。祝好运