第一次投sci，给了反馈意见，但是感觉没戏了，还请大神指点一二！意见如下:

Reviewers have now commented on your paper. ?You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. ?If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. ??

For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below.?

If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript.?
Modern Physics Letters B?

Reviewers' comments:?

Reviewer #1: This paper presents an experimental study on oblique water entry of an o-give nosed full-size vehicle. The reviewer considers this is a very rough article because there are some simple mistakes in the paper.?
1.? ? ?The introduction in this paper should be well organized.?
2.? ? ?Much redundant information like some pictures and introductions of the equipment are presented in the experiment process, which is completely not necessary.?
3.? ? ?The experimental results and discussion in this paper is just an enumeration of the effects of the attack angle on some factors. The authors should further analyze the results.
4.? ? ?The reviewer cannot understand why the authors firstly say the actual length of the assembled model is 1.92m, however, 2m is used in the equation (1).?
5.? ? ?Summary of the sections can be removed from the last part of the paper.?
6.? ? ?The English writing should be double checked because there are many simple mistakes in the paper.?
The reviewer suggests this paper have a second review after a major revision.
敢问大神，应该如何是好……

 返回小木虫查看更多