plos one 修回意见
plos one 投稿两个月,今天有了回复,这是本人第一次投稿,经常看到大家说大修小修,可是我的修回意见没有明确说明是大修还是小修。审稿人的问题基本都可以回答,除了涉及样本量比较麻烦之外。麻烦大家帮忙鉴定这是大修还是小修,谢谢大家了。
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised by the three reviewers.
We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by %REVISION_DUE_DATE%. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://pone.edmgr.com/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.
Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.
We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
楼主没有必要拘泥于大修还是小修,大修修改到位有直接被接收的,小修没注意有被拒稿的。既然责编给了修改的机会,说明文章有可取之处,楼主要参考审稿意见仔细修改,认真回复,修改到位文章就有接收的希望。
ps. 审稿人意见给的是大修还是小修?如果审稿人没有说明,责编往往根据修改量的大小来决定,给修回稿留的时间可以用来作为判断大修还是小修的标准,
你两个月就有回应,我9月4日投的,现在都快4个月了。还没结果,我也是这个杂志
你好,请问一下图片是不需要排版,单独上传就可以了吗