大修还是小修？
Editor's Comments:
Reviewer Comments:
Reviewer #1 Evaluations:
RECOMMENDATION: Reconsider after mandatory revision (major)
Original Paper required: Yes
Well Organized and Clear required : Yes
Free From Errors required : No
Conclusions Supported required : Yes
Satisfactory English required : No
Appropriate Title required : Yes
Good Abstract required : Yes
Clear Figures required : Yes
Adequate References required : Yes
Reviewer #1 (Comments to the Author required ):
Please review, mainly for English.
Reviewer #2 Evaluations:
RECOMMENDATION: Publish with mandatory revision (minor)
Original Paper required: Yes
Well Organized and Clear required : Yes
Free From Errors required : No
Conclusions Supported required : No
Satisfactory English required : Yes
Appropriate Title required : Yes
Good Abstract required : Yes
Clear Figures required : Yes
Adequate References required : Yes
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
大修小修都是相对的，有的大修比小修都简单，有的小修也会很麻烦，都有悲剧的可能。态度端正，认真回复，命中率就会很大。
可能意见并不多，但是给你的是大修。给修改意见就好，别的不重要
，
英语需要润色，估计行文不是很流畅吧，表述不很地道。
第一个审稿人给的是大修，第二个审稿人给的是小修，楼主修回的稿件仍然会回到第一个审稿人手中。不管大修还是小修，楼主都要仔细修改，认真回复，修改到位就有希望。