SCI拒稿理由该怎样修改?
SCI拒稿了,编辑说文中要添加误差分析
An error analysis is necessary, and also, for the results "In order to have 1% increase of the efficiency, the mass flow rate has to increase by 0.27% and 0.24% under 675W/m2 and 735W/m2 respectively. For the normalized temperature, a decrease of 0.373%, 0.464%, and 0.472% under 375W/m2, 435W/m2 and 535W/m2 respectively lead to 1% increase of thermal efficiency". It is thought that the sensors can not measured them so accurately.
但是文中已经做了误差分析,实验总的误差是8%左右,并且也在结果图上也加了误差棒,求助该再怎样修改?
还有后面的分析部分,编辑说效率每提高1%实验的精度达不到,可不可以改变说法,在误差为8%的前提下,效率每提高10%,这些因素贡献百分之多少?
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
提高的效率太小,可能就是在误差范围内,1%的效率没有意义,也就是说没有提高,因为有可能是误差引起的。
楼主你数据测的是多少就是多少,你这个误差8%,但你数据用1%的精确度你是怎么想的?不是说你随便说个数字可不可以,要看你的实验结果,