审稿人的提问,看不懂什么意思,求助,谢谢啊
Reviewer #1: The paper is well written and the result looks interesting. With that said, the authors should clarify the reproducibility of performance of different device, and ballpark the critical factors in device fabrication.
Reviewer #2: Noted on the corrections made based on comments received.
Thank you for the improvement made.
Only minor corrections:
To include reproducibility of the data.
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
两位审稿人的意思一致:reproducibility不同器件的重复数据,结果的大致范围等等
两个人都让你考虑可重复性的问题,避免你给出的是偶然的或者不具备代表性的结果。通常是给出误差范围或者error bar。
按要求改 机会很大
需要说明数据是从哪一组中选择的吗?或者是说明数据选择的原则什么的
,
器件的重复性怎么给出大致范围?谢谢