两个月审稿四行审稿意见是什么原因?
投稿国际多相流杂志,审稿两个月回来四行审稿意见,大家帮分析下是编辑疏忽把审稿意见没给全还是什么愿意,要与编辑再联系吗?
Ref: IJMF_2016_***
Title: ***
Journal: International Journal of Multiphase Flow
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to International Journal of Multiphase Flow. I regret to inform you that reviewers have advised against publishing your manuscript, and we must therefore reject it.
Please refer to the comments listed at the end of this letter for details of why I reached this decision.
We appreciate your submitting your manuscript to this journal and for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.
Kind regards,
Ashok Sangani
Associate Editor
International Journal of Multiphase Flow
Comments from the editors and reviewers:
-Reviewer 2
1. 1. In Table 2, why Gly1 with 0.00% Fib1 (Base fluid) shows two different viscosity?
2. 2. Modeling part should be presented separately.
3. 3. Model assumptions and limitations need to be listed properly.
4. 4. Result and discussion part needs improvement.
5. 5. Conclusion part is missing.
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
我也觉得是啊,而且编辑也不具体说下原因,直接就说一句据稿,感觉审稿意见也没给全
你到投稿系统里找找,说不定那儿是全的
感觉编辑挺不负责任的,就这几个意见。如果没找到其他意见,可以问问
这个就是在投稿系统里面找到的,我看了好多遍,就这几行意见。如果要问,是不是从投稿系统里面的邮箱直接与编辑联系?让编辑把所有审稿意见都给我
,
祝好
祝福,好运,心想事成!
↖(^ω^)↗