审稿人要求大修,只给出了一段话,求各位大牛帮忙分析一下
首先编辑那里发来邮件,写了major reversion。然后在referee report 那里写了一段话,Results and discussion section. Subtitle 3.2 (all paragraphs). The authors gave discussion, but the results were not compared with similar results that were published by other authors. The authors cited some references, but it is no enough for suitable scientific discussion. The author had to cite more related and relevant papers and give more discussion and evidence for theirs claims. This is very important for quality of the paper.这个怎么修改,是要我全部修改吗,求各位大牛帮帮忙解答一下。
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
讨论部分分析的不够,要再增加一些已发表类似文献对比分析实验结果,要说服这位审稿人就需要好好下功夫了
应该是你目前讨论的不全面,审稿人让再引用一些其他相关文献分析你的结论等等
个人建议:
1. 看看相关已发表文献怎么写这个部分的
2. 找个熟悉你们这个方向,发表过文章的师兄师姐帮你看看
审稿人是要你把你们自己的实验结果和已经发表的类似实验结果进行分析、比较和深入讨论。并且认为这对文章的质量来讲非常重要。所以按照审稿人的意见认真修改吧。祝福!
Subtitle 3.2 (all paragraphs),应该是副标题3.2中的所有段落
,