Optics Letters Proof疑问
论文进入PROOF阶段。
Instruction第六条：
Respond to any editor queries. Manuscripts are edited for grammar and clarity. A copy editor attempting to correct an ambiguity will use best judgment and draw your attention to the revised text by a query.
然后在下载的正文最后，看到了编辑提出的两点queries：
1. AU: In the sentence that begins “Accordingly, the LIDT of 100% probability,” please verify that the edits maintain its meaning.
2. AU: In the sentence that begins “The results suggested that the thickness of the DL,” please verify that the edits maintain its
meaning.
请问，这是让我回答编辑的问题还是核实文字内容无误？如何回复？
360截图20160912160600780.jpg
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
The results suggested that the thickness of the DL这好像不是一个完整的句子吧，上面那个也是一样的。有点中式~“结果显示DL的厚度。。。。”后面的。。。。是什么呢？是不是这样？
不是的，他只是把我句子前半部分拿出来了，这两个句子在正文中还有内容。
分别是1. Accordingly,the LIDT of 100% probability ranged from 25.2 to 50.4 J∕cm2.
2. The results suggested that the thickness of the DL might be RIE depth dependent
，
按照字面的意思就是让你群人一下你所表达的意思，我英语不太好，你找个人看看，你这两句话的表达会不会不符合老外的语法习惯。
额。我真是不知道哪里错了，缩写前文都提到了，这里用到的描述一旦问题没有。