food chemistry 大修，编辑提出一些意见不太懂，求助各位虫友！
1、编辑发的邮件中有下面段话，什么意思？
Food Chemistry features the Interactive Plot Viewer, see: https://www.elsevier.com/interactiveplots. Interactive Plots provide easy access to the data behind plots. To include one with your article, please prepare a .csv file with your plot data and test it online at https://authortools.elsevier.com/interactiveplots/verification before submission as supplementary material.
2.还有编辑在view letter的末尾给了一段他的意见 ，看得不太懂，什么意思？大家给看看，大修接受的可能性大吗？
Editor's Comments:
Two referees have now commented on your work and both believe that revision is in order. I always prefer to give the authors a chance to rework their contribution after the first review, if it is justified. Here it is justified. What I do notice, however, is that much revision and clarification need to be done before this paper might possibly be published. In fact, additional studies may be necessary in order to achieve this! If a revision (R1) is submitted by the authors, the R1 will be re-reviewed by the referees whose comments you see above. The reviewers will have access to all of the initial reviews (as well as my comments here) against which to cross-check. If the R1 is not found to be satisfactory at that point, the paper will be rejected. As it happens, reviews of R1s tend to be more Draconian in nature in terms of decisions made. Please consider the comments of both reviewers very carefully and either adopt or rebut each and every point made.
3.最后，还有一个问题，elsevier期刊（food chemistry）怎么查投稿整个过程的状态？就是经过哪些阶段和时间节点。 返回小木虫查看更多