投Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics（IF=1.65），一审用了2个多月，结果是小修后，Based on the advice received, the Editors have decided that your manuscript can be accepted for publication after you have carried out the corrections as suggested by the reviewer(s).
二审用了1个月，With regret, I must inform you that, based on the advice received, the Editors have decided that your manuscript cannot be accepted for publication in Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
气死了。请问有遇到过这样的事情吗？没有给出什么合适的理由。两次审稿人意见都是很简单的，请问该如何处理?

一审的审稿人意见：Reviewer #1: Dear Author,
thank you for submitting the manuscript: `。。。。` to the journal `Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics`. It was very interesting. Unfortunately, there are a few aspects I need to comment:
- many shortcuts make the manuscript confusing
- what is the clinical consequence?
- the tables and figures are not in a good quality and they are confusing
- please don`t write the name of a medication (Gonal-F) in the paper!
Thank you very much for your paper, if you revise the paper and go over the  mentioned points again the paper could be reviewed again.


二审的审稿人意见：thank you for resubmitting your revised manuscript.
After extensive reevaluation and discussion with experienced colleagues in the field we cannot recommend the manuscript for pubilcation as the very high standards of the journal are not met. 返回小木虫查看更多