sci新手。请大家帮忙看看主编的意思是据稿还是建议修改重投,谢谢!
之前投的一篇SCI,这是主编的回信内容(文章篇名之类的删掉了)。后续有三位审稿人意见,其中一位明确写出“ I strongly suggest that the authors reconsider rewriting this paper focusing on XXXX”,其他两名审稿人的意见中没有和直接提到建议是否修改或者拒稿等。
因为是新手,实在没有经验。请大家帮忙分析看看,主编的意思是直接的拒稿还是让修改后重新投啊?
如果主编的意思是是让修改后重投该杂志,这种情况下,重投的时候需要标注前一次投的编号吗?需要在cover letter 里面回复前一次审稿人的意见吗?
感谢!!
Thank you for submitting your article entitled xxxx(篇名) The article has been returned from peer review. I regret to inform you that the reviewers assigned to the manuscript did not recommend that we publish this manuscript, as currently submitted, in the American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy. Their comments are attached.
The Editorial Board hopes that you will find them helpful should you decide to submit a new manuscript on this topic to the American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy.
Again, thank you for submitting your work for consideration to the Journal.@Monash2011
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
拒稿。
按照评审意见修改后再作为一篇新文章提交,要注明之前的稿件ID和结果。
主编拒稿,但是鼓励楼主参考审稿意见重写文章后作为新稿件再投。重投的时候要说明之前的稿件编号,在cover letter中附上修改回复,
如果拒稿重投,作者应该注明情况,并跟修改一样,把以前的审稿意见和做出的修改都一一说明。
好像是拒稿,但是严格按照评审意见修改后可以再投
拒稿,改后可以重新投
就是拒稿。
另外,我感觉后面那句按照意见修改之后可以重投 就是一句客套话……