第一次投SCI的杂志审稿意见是Revise
Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that I have been advised that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision.
编辑的意见
eviewers' comments:
This manuscript studies the fluorescence quenching of metal ions in solution thus treating an interesting subject. The Introduction and, to some extent, also the Discussion of the Results rely on text previously published. This overlap is not recommended or acceptable. Also the subject has been considered before in a recent publication in the Envir. Sci. Pollution (2016). In this present version the manuscript is not recommended for publication. The suggestion is that the authors revise the manuscript avoiding text overlap and that the manuscript be reviewed again.
审稿人的意见, 这是大修的意思吧?修改怎么着手呢?不知道大修后被录的机会有多大?
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
这只是你的文章与别人有很多重复,修改后还需要再次审稿,与录不录无关
,
语言重复。好好修改不要完全抄别人的句子