第一次投SCI,编辑给的是revise
Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that I have been advised that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. 这是编辑的意见
Reviewers' comments:
This manuscript studies the fluorescence quenching of metal ions in solution thus treating an interesting subject. The Introduction and, to some extent, also the Discussion of the Results rely on text previously published. This overlap is not recommended or acceptable. Also the subject has been considered before in a recent publication in the Envir. Sci. Pollution (2016). In this present version the manuscript is not recommended for publication. The suggestion is that the authors revise the manuscript avoiding text overlap and that the manuscript be reviewed again.这是审稿人的意见
这是什么意思 ,我改怎么修改呢?
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
感觉是,你的论文和其他最近发表的论文有很多的重复,建议你避免这些重复,可以是重新设计实验等。好好改,还是有机会的,祝好运!
审稿人认为楼主的研究比较有意义,但文章的结果讨论部分与Envir. Sci. Pollution最近发表的一篇文章有较多相同之处,这是不允许的。文章需要修改避免重复,修回的稿件仍然需要送审。
重新设计实验,改掉有重复嫌疑的,再投
我是重新设计实验?还是再加点实验呢?修改之后投过去是不是比之前的审稿快一些?
投的是Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy
,