投了一篇AAP，第一轮主编让major revision，修好后第二轮审稿主编仍然要修改，这时候审稿人的意见只剩一个人的了，一个月后修回。目前在第三轮审稿阶段，还请大神帮忙看看第二轮的意见，看这篇论文有没有戏吧，另外也想问问一般第三轮审稿多久可以知道结果。附第二轮审稿人意见：

Reviewer #2: The paper deals with a really important matter, such as the safety and risk management related to the vessel traffic. The paper is generally well written and also well structured. Despite this some minor revisions are still needed before considering the paper suitable for publication. First of all some typos are still present and in some parts of the work a linguistic revision might improve the overall quality of the paper. Moreover, even if the paper has been modified, some points remain unclear: the methodology (e.g. the indexes and their application) is not well explained and then it is hard to fully understand it (or how the indexes are calculated or "applied&quot. Moreover, I would suggest the authors to improve the conclusive remarks since it is still not clear the contribution of the paper in terms of originality, policy implications and the possibility to generalize the proposed method to other contexts. 返回小木虫查看更多