小弟投了一个springer下的期刊，现在收到编辑的邮件如下：

We have received the reports from our advisors on your manuscript, "xxxxx", which you submitted to xxxxxxx.

Based on the advice received, the Editor feels that your manuscript could be reconsidered for publication should you be prepared to incorporate the major revisions recommended by the reviewers.  When preparing your revised manuscript, you are asked to carefully consider the reviewer comments which are received above.

Your revised manuscript will be sent back to the reviewers to allow them to confirm that the changes address the issues they have set out in their review comments, and that the revised manuscript is acceptable for publication.


COMMENTS FOR THE AUTHOR:
We found overlap between this manuscript and published articles mostly for technical terms and fragment of sentences.     
Declaration on conflict of interest should be provided.

令小弟感到比较困惑的是，编辑的意思是根据审稿人的意见，最终给了大修，但是意见只有这么两条呢？ 而且意见只是说文章重复率有点高。感觉这两条意见不是审稿人给出的啊（小弟做的是元启发式算法的应用，用新的算法解决的一个比较经典的问题，因此在对算法和问题的描述上确实和之前的一些论文有重复。crosscheck检测结果为19%）。在我的印象里，大修都是有很多意见的啊。请问大家有没有类似的经历？或者大家觉的这是个什么情况？ 返回小木虫查看更多