文献中的部分内容与现在文章的内容有一部分相同的内容,被秒拒
最近投了一篇文章,与之前我中的文章有一部分相同,结果被编辑在十分钟内就拒稿了,我想修改修改再投,把这篇文章与之前不同的内容突出写,不知道对不对,希望大家给点思路,不胜感谢,以下是拒稿信:
Materials and Design experiences a very high level of submissions, and there is strong competition for publication as the Journal has a limited amount of space. In order to save the time of both reviewers and authors, manuscripts are subjected to a preliminary screening by the Editor of the Journal, in order to determine if they should go forward for review.
Although all research builds on prior results, noticeable similarity with previously published findings may reduce that originality which forms a crucial consideration in the prioritization of submissions for further review.
I regret to inform you that your manuscript did not obtain a sufficient priority rating in relation to the space available for publication for us to be able to give it any further consideration for publication in Materials and Design.
I am sorry not to be able to give you better news, and wish you success in publishing this paper elsewhere. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
修改吧
编辑认为太雷同
如果楼主所做研究的创新点确实不够,不论是再投还是改投都容易被拒,建议楼主在修稿之前找导师或者业内牛人帮忙把关。
建议还是修改一下,突出一下创新点,重点说明比现有论文好在哪?在肯定别人的成果后,说一说别人的毛病。编辑不会太仔细揣摩文字背后的意思的,因为他们太忙了,所以话要说明白一些,