Response to Reviewers (mandatory)
咨询一下各位虫友,文章投稿一个星期,目前还在编辑手里,但编辑给我回复了以下需要补充的内容。
第二条和第三条到没有什么问题,但是第一条回复reviewers他这里明显是针对审稿人的回复意见啊,但是我的论文还只在编辑手里,那这个第一条回复信怎么写???
1. Response to Reviewers (mandatory)
This should be a separate file labeled "Response to Reviewers" that carefully addresses, point-by-point, the issues raised in the comments appended below. You should also include a suitable rebuttal to any specific request for change that you have not made. Mention the page, paragraph, and line number of any revisions that are made.
2. Manuscript and Figure Source Files (mandatory)
We cannot accommodate PDF manuscript files for production purposes. We also ask that when submitting your revision you follow the journal formatting guidelines. Figures and tables may be embedded within the source file for the submission as long as they are of sufficient resolution for Production. For any figure that cannot be embedded within the source file (such as *.PSD Photoshop files), the original figure needs to be uploaded separately. Refer to the Guide for Authors for additional information.
3. Highlights (mandatory)
Highlights consist of a short collection of bullet points that convey the core findings of the article and should be submitted in a separate file in the online submission system. Please use 'Highlights' in the file name and include 3 to 5 bullet points (maximum 85 characters, including spaces, per bullet point). See the following website for more information
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
就当是审过一轮了 对问题2-3 写letter呗
那我这个Response to Reviewers 是发给编辑看的吗
,
Response to Reviewers是针对外审审稿意见的回复,格式审稿意见回复一般写在Response to technical check中。期刊投稿系统没有Response to technical check吗?
你投稿的是EngGeo吧~~~