论文被拒，求指导
一个审稿人给了大修，一个给了修改重投，编辑拒了。有必要修改后重投吗？重投有希望吗？求指教
1. The geological background of the study area should be provided to the readers, as well as a regional geological map showing the locations of the studied wells.
2. Some abbreviations, such as Es3, T2 and so on, should have their full connotation when appear at the first time.
3. The discussion part (section 4) is too short and too simple. Some interpretation in section 2 and section 3 could be moved into section 4.
4. Detailed figure captions are needed for all the figures.
5. The written English is poor and needs to be significant improved.
意见2
1. The main scientific problem in this paper is about pore distribution, so I suggest the authors need to write a well paragraph about the scientific problem in "Introduction" section. And organized the latest advances in this field.
2. There are too many descriptions and basic knowledge in the manuscript, which is not necessary, e.g. sections 2.1, 2.2, 3.1 and 3.2. These sections need to be reedited in detail.
3. The figures are very poor, and need to be redrawn. Fig.3 also has some Chinese, Fig.7 lacks of depth……
4. The discussion section need to rewritten, and should has a well relationship with the evidences in the above sections.
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
祝福
戳四愕奈侍猓饕侍饪赡苁怯镅晕侍狻！Ｇ夷愕挠镅晕侍獾贾铝撕芏嘌苌侍猓乙灿龅秸庵智榭龉阋凑腋鲎ㄒ道贤獍锬愀模椿ㄇ腋龌拱锬愀摹！？隙晃侍狻！Ｗ：茫�