最近一篇文章返修回来，共两个审稿人，意见都不多，也不难改，但编辑给了个大修。主要是想让小伙伴们看一下，审稿人2是什么意思，是不是还没有正式给意见，先让我处理完这些问题后再给意见。
Referee: 1
Comments to the Author
The authors present an ondoubtedly interesting manuscript with scientific findings that are very successfully applied.
I suggest the paper is accepted with minor revisions. However, the authors must get their manuscript read by a native English speaker because the text is often a bit difficult to read. The authors should also revise carefully the spell of the words used in the manuscript as well as in figures/figure captions. For instance, Figure 7d: Stwich instead of switch.

Referee: 2
Comments to the Author
The topic of the manuscript (fabrication of metal patterns onto textile substrates) fits with the scope of Journal of Materials Chemistry C.
Before preparing the review report for this manuscript, we would ask to the Authors to consider a few issues:
a) Reconsider the sense of the arrows in Scheme 1 to make the sequence of the events clear.
b) Explain the meaning of Ni pattern, mentioned in Fig 8 and SI, but never discussed in the main file.
c) Properly name Figure 2g-f
d) Describe the steps between  2(a-c) and 2(d-e).
We will be happy to review the revised version of the manuscript. @Monash2011 返回小木虫查看更多