Editor讓大修，但如何回覆�?稿人的reject意見～～
各位蟲友好，小弟之前於Journal of alloys and compounds投稿，日前收到�?稿意見，共有３個�?稿人，
第一個�?稿人意見重點為The topic of this work meets the interest of the Journal of Alloys and Compounds readership and would therefore be publishable here. 算是接受。
第二個�?稿人的意見為Ｉ have calfullly read the paper. The article has only presented the calculated results and it is not novel and interesting to warrant publication in this magazine。
第三個大致為The results are original and seem correct and logical, but their presentation is poor, making it sometimes difficult to follow. Besides, the references are inadequate and some of them even wrongly stated. The paper is suitable for publication after revision. I strongly advice the authors to correct the references and typos and improve the language in order to present their results in a clear manner. Detailed comments on the paper are given below..........
Editor讓我major revision，我想請為各位蟲友，對於第二個�?稿人的意見，我該如何回應，感謝各位回答。
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
关注中，同遇到
我感觉回复写出你的创新点给他看吧
针对他的疑问作出真诚的回答，实在不行就说将在下一步的研究中着重研究等等，要表现出诚意来。
楼主的回复需要在总结前人研究的基础上，着重突出文章的创新点以及所做研究的意义。
突出你的创新点呗。回答的时候强调一下，主要说明和别人工作的不同。在文章中和response
letter中都做出说明。
就重新总结说明你的创新点，你得工作就可以了。其实给他，只是象征性的回复，这个审稿人很有可能不会再审你得文章。
，