投稿，一个reviewer给出了如下总结性评论，是不是代表没戏了？
Reviewer 1：
前面一共9个小问题，最后的总结陈词为：
Overall, the results of the paper seem good in comparison to existing techniques for discussion at a workshop but
details, clarity and presentation needs significant improvement to be published in a journal.

另一个reviewer就寥寥数语
It is well-written paper.
I would recommend in Section 3.3, rather than just the definition of the Acoustic features it would be clear to
include the relevance and importance of a particular feature in terms ******. The Section seems
disconnected with the domain.

幸运地是最终editor给了个小修的结果。

对于第一个reviewer给出这样的结语，应该如何回复比较好？有没有人遇到类似的comments，望指教，谢谢。 返回小木虫查看更多