Thank you for your recent submission to Journal of Materials Chemistry A, published by the Royal Society of Chemistry. All manuscripts are initially assessed by the editors to ensure they meet the criteria for publication in the journal.

After careful evaluation of your manuscript, I regret to inform you that I do not find your work suitable for publication in Journal of Materials Chemistry A as the work is not adequately set in context with the literature. The properties reported are not directly compared with similar state-of-the-art materials making it difficult to judge what improvements they offer. Therefore, your article has been rejected and will not be considered further by Journal of Materials Chemistry A.

However, if you are able to revise your manuscript to clearly demonstrate an improvement over the state-of-the-art (for example, by including a comparison table with related discussion) then I would be pleased to consider a new submission at a later date.

Full details of the initial assessment process can be found at:
https://www.rsc.org/journals-boo ... licies/#submissions

I am sorry not to have better news for you, however, thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your manuscript. If you chose not to resubmit with additional comparisons, I wish you every success in publishing this manuscript elsewhere.

Yours sincerely,
Dr Suzanne Howson MRSC
Publishing Editor
Royal Society of Chemistry, Thomas Graham House,
Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, UK CB4 0WF

请问如果我增加了表格进行性能对比，是否还有机会被JMCA接收？
Reject Without Peer Review 让人感觉有点虚，编辑为了这个理由就可以直接拒稿而不送往同行评议的吗？ 返回小木虫查看更多