刚收到期刊的审稿意见，里面有些问题不太懂，请大神帮忙（如下），还有不知道是否有人有类似的问题：审稿人就只有一个人的审稿意见，不知道这种现象是正常的么？
另外关于主编要求论文修改为note，提交的论文页数和图数稍微超出了期刊note投稿要求，是否有影响？
因为是第一次遇到这种情况，请大神前来指导！！！！
COMMENTS FROM EDITOR AND/OR REVIEWERS

Reviewer #2:

1. Preparation and citing the  Figures should  fit to instruction for Author.（这一条是什么意思啊？）
2. Authors mentioned that due to Figure 5 as the temperature increased, the porosity decreased. From the pattern it seems that the porosity data at 50oC is not significanty different with that of 60oC. Please give explanation on this.
3. Authors did not explain how to measure the porosity.
4. Authors measured are some cations exchange capacity, what is the meaning and relationship of each and the relationship among those data??（还有这一条是什么意思啊？）


Associate Editor:
The manuscript is interesting, however Moderate revision is necessary. In additon to the reviewer´s comments more discussions related on physicochemical clay mineral is required. Plese is it possible write the "??????" reference in English language. Give the initial pH of the system for initial Zeta potential. Specify "the moisture content for prepared samples was 1,600%" ??. Use the Guide for Author, each used method should be detailed. This manuscript can be resend as a Technical Note (see you the format in Guide for Author). 返回小木虫查看更多