当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >被编辑拒了,rejected by editor 还能再提交吗

被编辑拒了,rejected by editor 还能再提交吗

作者 michael_wong
来源: 小木虫 1250 25 举报帖子
+关注

第一次投稿,准备了一年多,准备投稿remote sensing,第一天提交,第二天就得到编辑的回复,并且投稿状态变为:rejected by editor。对方语气不够直接,是委婉的让我投其他期刊还是让我把discussion改改再投? 求助,先谢谢大家
下面是邮件内容:
We are writing to inform you that we will not be able to process your paper
further due to unprepared Discussion section as per detailed requirement at
https://www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing/instructions. Papers sent for
peer-review are selected on the basis of discipline, novelty and general
significance, in addition to the usual criteria for publication in scholarly
journals. Therefore, our decision is not necessarily a reflection of the
quality of your research.

Remote Sensing\'s Special Instructions to Authors is also attached for your
future reference. We are STRICTLY following its detailed requirements to
accept/reject papers, especially concerning "Discussion" (compared with
related publication in this topic comprehensively), "Uncertainties, Errors,
and Accuracies", and "Conclusion" sections as per Research Article\'s
definition. Or, if this is a Technical Note, it is important to clarify its
explanations of a single concept, technique, or study clearly, which deserve
rapid publication, and shorten the length to less than 5 pages.

We wish you every success if you choose to submit the paper elsewhere. 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • michael_wong

    引用回帖:
    7楼: Originally posted by paperhunter at 2016-05-05 12:41:30
    We wish you every success if you choose to submit the paper elsewhere.

    楼主还是改投吧。

    改投该期刊的专刊可以吗,会不会也是同一个责任编辑

  • wegreen

    换杂志

  • shebailu015

    感觉前面有不少都是套话。
    We wish you every success if you choose to submit the paper elsewhere.这句才是真的。
    编辑都说让改投就只能如他所愿了。

  • paperhunter

    引用回帖:
    9楼: Originally posted by michael_wong at 2016-05-05 12:51:35
    改投该期刊的专刊可以吗,会不会也是同一个责任编辑...

    专刊有自己的责编,改投专刊碰到同一责编可能性不大,但在Cover letter中必须说明以前投过稿,不能隐瞒,所以这种改投意义貌似不大。

  • crazydr

    还是改投为妥

  • 雪汐雪

    编辑觉得你的discussion写的不好

  • cfm877

    dicussion 要求是单独的
    楼主是不是results and discussion,写在一起了

  • michael_wong

    引用回帖:
    15楼: Originally posted by cfm877 at 2016-05-05 17:49:16
    dicussion 要求是单独的
    楼主是不是results and discussion,写在一起了

    单独写的,因为这个期刊是OA的,还看了很多他上面的期刊,有些甚至没有discussion,有的直接和result合在一起写了,我是严格按照模板,单独写的,分为质量评估和研究局限性两点

猜你喜欢
下载小木虫APP
与700万科研达人随时交流
  • 二维码
  • IOS
  • 安卓