被编辑拒了,rejected by editor 还能再提交吗
第一次投稿,准备了一年多,准备投稿remote sensing,第一天提交,第二天就得到编辑的回复,并且投稿状态变为:rejected by editor。对方语气不够直接,是委婉的让我投其他期刊还是让我把discussion改改再投? 求助,先谢谢大家
下面是邮件内容:
We are writing to inform you that we will not be able to process your paper
further due to unprepared Discussion section as per detailed requirement at
https://www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing/instructions. Papers sent for
peer-review are selected on the basis of discipline, novelty and general
significance, in addition to the usual criteria for publication in scholarly
journals. Therefore, our decision is not necessarily a reflection of the
quality of your research.
Remote Sensing\'s Special Instructions to Authors is also attached for your
future reference. We are STRICTLY following its detailed requirements to
accept/reject papers, especially concerning "Discussion" (compared with
related publication in this topic comprehensively), "Uncertainties, Errors,
and Accuracies", and "Conclusion" sections as per Research Article\'s
definition. Or, if this is a Technical Note, it is important to clarify its
explanations of a single concept, technique, or study clearly, which deserve
rapid publication, and shorten the length to less than 5 pages.
We wish you every success if you choose to submit the paper elsewhere.
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
改投该期刊的专刊可以吗,会不会也是同一个责任编辑
换杂志
感觉前面有不少都是套话。
We wish you every success if you choose to submit the paper elsewhere.这句才是真的。
编辑都说让改投就只能如他所愿了。
专刊有自己的责编,改投专刊碰到同一责编可能性不大,但在Cover letter中必须说明以前投过稿,不能隐瞒,所以这种改投意义貌似不大。
还是改投为妥
编辑觉得你的discussion写的不好
dicussion 要求是单独的
楼主是不是results and discussion,写在一起了
单独写的,因为这个期刊是OA的,还看了很多他上面的期刊,有些甚至没有discussion,有的直接和result合在一起写了,我是严格按照模板,单独写的,分为质量评估和研究局限性两点
,