审稿人意见如下"I have reviewed the manuscript ""Inhibition of calcium scales by a non-phosphate and polyether-based polycarboxylate antiscalant for cooling water systems" The manuscript can be accepted after minor revision. You can find the comments following."
1.In the results parts, authors should give the detail spectroscopically proof of the synthesis and mechanism behind the inhibition phenomena.
2.Authors should use the error bar on the inhibition graphs and tables.
3.In Addition the English of the paper is very poor. Author should carry out a linguistic revision of the paper.
第一次投稿，
我的理解是第一条:需要再提供一种能证明物质合成成功的表征（在results)部分，还是说我原本手稿里关于物质的光谱学表征不够具体，细节需要解释一下呢？
并且论证下阻垢的机理。
第二条：没怎么看懂，是使用误差分析嘛？
第三条：英语词汇语法还需加强.
请各位前辈帮我分析分析

@Monash2011 返回小木虫查看更多